| Evaluation of Scriptural Support for Insider Movements |
|
This paper is a theological and ecclesiological response by Basil Grafas to what is popularly labeled as Insider movements. 21st century missiology is largely engaged in an animated debate concerning the validity and merits of Insider Movements. These are variously defined as 'popular movements to Christ that bypass both formal and explicit
expressions of Christian religion' or 'movements to Jesus that remain to varying degrees inside the social fabric of Islamic, Buddhist, Hindu, or other people groups'. Grafas responds to a paper of John Ridgeway, titled The Movement of the Gospel in New Testament Times With Special Reference to Insider Movements. Basil Grafas responds : Fundamentally, Insiders are those who profess faith in Christ but remain members of their original religious communities; Muslims remain Muslims, Hindus remain Hindus and Buddhists remain Buddhists. This approach to evangelism and missions has been, to say the least, contentious. Much of the literature written in support of the methodology and opposed to it has been anecdotal. War stories abound extolling the merits of Insider Movements that promise to transform Gospel-resistant cultures wedded to Islam or Hinduism. Horror stories also filter in warning the Church of the threat posed by aberrant syncretistic religion living in some netherworld between Christianity and unbelief. The problem of course is that it is difficult or impossible to argue with personal experience. Fortunately, proponents of Insider methodology have provided us with an admirable foundation for evaluating their claims, complete with a theological framework and scriptural basis. John Ridgeway has worked particularly hard to provide a scriptural base for his support of Insider methodology. |
writings in this issue on our frontpage. If you click the button